Difference between revisions of "Installing Samba from the command line"
(20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
= Configure the test share = | = Configure the test share = | ||
* <code>sudo vi /etc/samba/smb.conf</code> | * <code>sudo vi /etc/samba/smb.conf</code> | ||
== As a publicly accessible share == | |||
[New_share] | [New_share] | ||
comment= my share | comment= my share | ||
path = /home/'''USER'''/share | path = /home/'''USER'''/share | ||
force create mode = 0660 ; readable and writable by user and group | |||
force directory mode = 0770 ; readable, writable and searchable by user and group | |||
browseable = yes | browseable = yes | ||
Read only = no | Read only = no | ||
guest ok = | guest ok = yes | ||
'''Note:''' Files & folders placed in this share by an anonymous user will belong to '''nobody:nogroup'''. | |||
:oddly, even as the owner of the share, you won't have direct control over these files/folders. | |||
:So, it might be a good idea to add yourself to the '''nogroup''' group: | |||
:* <code>sudo usermod -a -G nogroup '''USER'''</code> | |||
== As a share requiring authentication == | |||
While you're in there, if you don't have printer(s) connected to the machine, comment out or remove the [printers] and [print$] blocks | [New_share] | ||
comment= my share | |||
path = /home/'''USER'''/share | |||
browseable = yes | |||
Read only = no | |||
guest ok = no | |||
= Restart Samba = | |||
While you're in there, if you don't have printer(s) connected to the machine, comment out or remove the '''[printers]''' and '''[print$]''' blocks | |||
* <code>sudo systemctl restart smbd</code> | * <code>sudo systemctl restart smbd</code> | ||
Line 40: | Line 59: | ||
= Additional bits to install = | = Additional bits to install = | ||
Client & utils & such... (optional) | Client & utils & such... (optional) | ||
* <code>sudo apt install cifs-utils samba-client -y</code> | |||
In order to be able to [[Mounting CIFS Shares from the command line{{!}}mount CIFS (Samba, Windows...) shares]] from other servers | |||
* <code>sudo apt install cifs-utils -y</code> | |||
For some reason... | |||
* <code>sudo apt install samba-client -y</code> | |||
seems to be recommended. Gonna hafta research what that actually provides. | |||
= Usage Notes = | = Usage Notes = | ||
'''NOTE:''' At this point, the share can be accessed, but you need to know where it is because Samba does not advertise it's presence. | '''NOTE:''' At this point, the share can be accessed, but you need to know where it is because Samba does not advertise it's presence. | ||
You '''can''' see the shares from the machine by entering <code>smb://'''MACHINENAME'''/</code> into the address bar of your file browser. | :You '''can''' see the shares from the machine by entering <code>smb://'''MACHINENAME'''/</code> into the address bar of your file browser. | ||
'''Also... SMB seems to get harder & harder to deal with.''' If just trying to get to the server results in '''Error: Failed to retrieve share list from server: Invalid argument''', it's because of some of the many changes done to the protocols over the years. | |||
* <code>sudo vi /etc/samba/smb.conf</code> | |||
& add | |||
client min protocol = NT1 | |||
server min protocol = NT1 | |||
into the '''[global]''' section. (after the "'''workgroup ='''" line is recommended.) | |||
== Show shares == | |||
* <code>sudo smbstatus --shares</code> | |||
= Ongoing Research = | |||
Still need to find a way for Samba to properly show up when browsing the network... | |||
Hey SAMBA! How about a solution to the whole "nobody:nogroup" stupidity??? | |||
[[Category:Linux]] | [[Category:Linux]] | ||
[[Category: WIP]] |
Latest revision as of 13:19, 24 September 2024
11 (bullseye) |
|
Basic Samba install & minimal configuration
(Assuming you'll replace USER with your own username...)
mkdir ~/share
touch ~/share/Foo
Install Samba
sudo apt install samba -y
sudo vi /etc/samba/smb.conf
[New_share] comment= my share path = /home/USER/share force create mode = 0660 ; readable and writable by user and group force directory mode = 0770 ; readable, writable and searchable by user and group browseable = yes Read only = no guest ok = yes
Note: Files & folders placed in this share by an anonymous user will belong to nobody:nogroup.
- oddly, even as the owner of the share, you won't have direct control over these files/folders.
- So, it might be a good idea to add yourself to the nogroup group:
sudo usermod -a -G nogroup USER
[New_share] comment= my share path = /home/USER/share browseable = yes Read only = no guest ok = no
Restart Samba
While you're in there, if you don't have printer(s) connected to the machine, comment out or remove the [printers] and [print$] blocks
sudo systemctl restart smbd
Set up usernames & passwords for Samba acess
(Samba uses it's own password list. Therefore, you'll need to set up each user...)
For each user that will be allowed access (USERs must exist as users on the system),
sudo smbpasswd -a USER
Additional bits to install
Client & utils & such... (optional)
In order to be able to mount CIFS (Samba, Windows...) shares from other servers
sudo apt install cifs-utils -y
For some reason...
sudo apt install samba-client -y
seems to be recommended. Gonna hafta research what that actually provides.
Usage Notes
NOTE: At this point, the share can be accessed, but you need to know where it is because Samba does not advertise it's presence.
- You can see the shares from the machine by entering
smb://MACHINENAME/
into the address bar of your file browser.
Also... SMB seems to get harder & harder to deal with. If just trying to get to the server results in Error: Failed to retrieve share list from server: Invalid argument, it's because of some of the many changes done to the protocols over the years.
sudo vi /etc/samba/smb.conf
& add
client min protocol = NT1 server min protocol = NT1
into the [global] section. (after the "workgroup =" line is recommended.)
sudo smbstatus --shares
Ongoing Research
Still need to find a way for Samba to properly show up when browsing the network...
Hey SAMBA! How about a solution to the whole "nobody:nogroup" stupidity???